Idle power consumption was measured at just over four watts for the entire device, which is definitely good for what is supposed to be an entry-level desktop.
Until now, the Cupertino company has been relatively vague about the power consumption of M1 silicon, only showing charts that illustrate improved better performance per watt versus an Intel CPU of the same performance class and how that contributes to better battery life.Īnandtech found in its analysis that power consumption for the Mac mini M1 averaged 26.5 watts at the wall, assuming a multi-threaded workload. This has led to a MacBook Air that is fanless and stays relatively cool when in use, while keeping the same performance and lasting longer on a battery charge when compared to its predecessor.
Mac mini 2012 ram arm broken free#
Between that and an erratic schedule release schedule, Apple embarked on the decision to unify the architecture that powers its iPhone, iPad, and Mac lineups, allowing it to break free of Intel when it comes to designing its products. One of the reasons Apple is leaving Intel behind is that the latter has been slow to come up with x86 processors that deliver better efficiency. And at least according to reviewers and early adopters, these machines live up to the company's promises, even if they're admittedly not for everyone yet. When Apple revealed the first line of M1-powered devices, it made a number of claims about the performance and energy efficiency of these systems when compared to Intel-powered counterparts. But even as Apple's own power consumption figures exceed those observed by reviewers, they make Intel look particularly bad when you consider the superior performance of Apple Silicon. The big picture: It shouldn't be all that surprising that an SoC powering a fanless MacBook Air is more energy efficient than an Intel 8th-gen Core i7 CPU rated at a TDP of 65 watts, which does need a fan to keep cool.
0 kommentar(er)
